|
Post by paranger on Aug 25, 2023 16:27:35 GMT -7
Just finished forging this based on another ca. 1730-60 French spiked tomahawk. Overall length is about 9", with a 2" bit and 4" spike. I am currently debating between fire hardened ash and curly maple for a handle.
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Aug 25, 2023 18:41:14 GMT -7
As an art piece, curly maple. But as the instrument of war it was designed to be, hickory, ash, or plain maple would seem more fitting.
Do we have an idea of what originals we're hafted with?
Regardless of wood chosen, looks to be some mighty fine forge work.
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Aug 25, 2023 18:49:40 GMT -7
As an art piece, curly maple. But as the instrument of war it was designed to be, hickory, ash, or plain maple would seem more fitting. Do we have an idea of what originals we're hafted with? Regardless of wood chosen, looks to be some mighty fine forge work. Thanks, Nock. I agree with your assessment on wood choice. Unfortunately, the haft of the original I based this on does not survive, so no help there.
|
|
RyanAK
City-dweller
Once scalped…
Posts: 973
|
Post by RyanAK on Aug 25, 2023 19:09:32 GMT -7
So few true tomahawk period hafts survive, it’s tough to make generalizations. But… generally… hardwoods from the region of manufacture/use.
My recent research reveals this… among native cultures, the tomahawk held a special place of reverence. Especially pipe tomahawks. These were weapons and held spiritual significance. As such, ornamentation was common. For any native, reasonably figured wood would likely be appropriate, as would the ‘tool’ hardwoods. Carving on the haft or file work on the head, inlays on both head and haft, and - for certain cultures - tacks or beaded drops were common. Pure utility wasn’t the point of a native tomahawk.
White use of ‘true’ tomahawks - belt axes and hatchets were often called a “tomahawk” in the period and continues to this day - seems to be much more limited. If a NY provincial or New England militiaman was armed with a “tomahawk”, it was likely what we call a belt axe today. Thus, this form was multi-use and was likely hafted with ‘tool’ hardwood from the area. Ash, hickory, fruitwoods, etc. If an English or American Ranger or militiaman was in a financial position to own a single-purpose weapon like a true tomahawk, he would have been of the class, possibly an officer, that could afford finer things and you may see fancier woods and inlays, etc. My research of French and Canadian use of tru tomahawks is exactly… nothing.
For JJ’s spike hawk…. Ash would be appropriate if it’s native to New France. I’m unclear on the range of the various ashes. Certainly maple would be appropriate and is known to have been utilized for both native- and white-used goods produced or repaired in New France.
I’d personally lean to the curly maple as the most PC choice unless it’s the stuff contemporary longrifle owners have wet dreams over.
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Aug 26, 2023 4:35:55 GMT -7
Do we have an indication of what proportion of tomahawks were made in Canada compared to made in France for trade to inhabitants of Canada/New France?
I also wonder about the aspect of decoration and ornamentation of something like a tomahawk earlier in the period, say late 1600s through early to mid 1700s. While we see natives in English colonies rake to bright colored fabrics and other decorative things pretty quickly, as well as seeing some lightly carved decorations on things like bows (I'm thinking of the "turtle bow"). I don't get the impression that Eastern tribes, at least not early on, didn't go as far with this as western tribes did later. Just my impression/perception of things, could be way, way, off.
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Aug 26, 2023 5:21:35 GMT -7
Do we have an indication of what proportion of tomahawks were made in Canada compared to made in France for trade to inhabitants of Canada/New France? I also wonder about the aspect of decoration and ornamentation of something like a tomahawk earlier in the period, say late 1600s through early to mid 1700s. While we see natives in English colonies rake to bright colored fabrics and other decorative things pretty quickly, as well as seeing some lightly carved decorations on things like bows (I'm thinking of the "turtle bow"). I don't get the impression that Eastern tribes, at least not early on, didn't go as far with this as western tribes did later. Just my impression/perception of things, could be way, way, off. According to collector and professional authenticator Mark Miller, the vast majority of spiked tomahawks were locally blacksmith-made rather than imported, which accounts for their great diversity as well as their relative absence on trade lists.
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Aug 26, 2023 6:23:16 GMT -7
Thank you.
|
|
RyanAK
City-dweller
Once scalped…
Posts: 973
|
Post by RyanAK on Aug 26, 2023 6:50:28 GMT -7
My research agrees with JJ’s quote of Mark Miller.
What we all likely think of as “fancy” tomahawks with tacks and beads were generally 19c and western nations, but there is a lot of ornamentation on early and eastern hawks as well… mostly in the form of file work or inlays on the head but poured bands on the haft were around as well.
|
|