|
Post by nobody on Sept 20, 2020 15:25:17 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Sept 20, 2020 16:58:32 GMT -7
My answer would be good in general, but it particularly depends on the author.
Rene Chartrand, for instance, is superb. I believe he worked for the Canadian National Park system for years, and he is a true scholar. I buy his books sight unseen at this point. My best friend is the Director of the U.S. Army's Military History Institute, and an 18th c. historian himself and shares my opinion of Chartrand.
Gary Zaboly has done a lot of work on Roger's Rangers over the years, and while I wouldn't quite put him in Chartrand's class, I would still generally endorse his work.
I own all the books you listed except the Patriot Militiaman one and would recommend them.
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Oct 1, 2020 7:20:33 GMT -7
My thoughts concerning historical books isn't much regarding the publication company but the author. A good author will do his homework, list his sourcing and other prudent information in his text. I would look at what the author is using to sight information and from where or whom before deciding on something you intend to use for historical purposes.
|
|