|
Post by lenapej on Jan 12, 2023 11:38:57 GMT -7
I shot a doe this past season and my brother bark tanned it for me, I want to make a shot bag with it and was wondering if I could get some help from ya'll. My impression is late 1750's PA & OH country, common man, I desire to be as PC as I can and am wondering is there a basic shape I should have for the bag? square, heart shape, deeper rather than wide? etc. How about a button on the flap or no? buckle on strap? flap shape? Maybe we don't have enough originals to answer these questions? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Jan 12, 2023 14:45:40 GMT -7
Rifle or smoothbore? It would seem early shot pouches associated with rifles were pretty small, from what little we have to go by. I can see that. I find I need a lot less stuff, or the stuff I need is less bulky, for a rifle than my smoothbores. For a rifle all I really keep in the shot pouch is patch material, balls (usually in a bag), and a small flint wallet with 2 or 3 spare flints, ball puller, turn screw, and tow worm or cleaning jag, and a couple dry patches. Might stick a hank of tow along the bottom of the bag. The small rectangular bag that Wallace Gusler attributes to early Virginia is about perfect, I think. Simple shape, small, no buckle, strap is sewn to one corner and attached at the other corner with a button. A series of button holes in the strap allow for length adjustment at the attachment point. Button down flap. It would appear that the buttons used may have worked similar to cuff links. Like an inner and outer button linked through a hole in the leather with thread.
If shooting a smoothbore with roundball and using patches (which we don't think to be historically accurate that early), this bag could still work well. Once we start adding wadding material, even just precut flat wads, and/or stuff to shoot shot, I find the bag too small, and lacking organization.
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Jan 12, 2023 15:45:17 GMT -7
My impression is pretty much the same period and location as yours. I made this as my rifle bag, also from bark-tanned deer. It is heart shaped, which is often associated with Appalachia, and measures 6" wide and 7" tall. Its contents are pretty much what Brockenock listed for his.
|
|
|
Post by lenapej on Jan 12, 2023 17:32:23 GMT -7
Thanks for the replies.
Brockennock, I only have the Fusil de Chasse smoothbore, and most of the time I load round ball the same as shot, with wads, I do try to only keep what it takes to shoot & load during the day, as you described.
Paranger, thanks that is a great looking bag, I have been leaning towards a more square bag (kinda like the hair on bag you posted in an earlier tread) but wasn't sure yet, having a hard time deciding.
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Jan 12, 2023 17:38:35 GMT -7
All of the bag shapes you mentioned (square, round, or heart) would work for the period and location you picked, I think.
Even among the few surviving early bags, button/no button flap, buckle/no buckle straps are represented. So, I guess it comes down to personal preference, as there are advantages and disadvantages to each.
One thing I would observe is that the early bags seem to have a tendency to be on the smaller side: no more than 8" wide or tall, and 7" or less is probably a better bet.
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Jan 12, 2023 19:01:44 GMT -7
I will try to take some new pics tomorrow, upload them to imgur (hopefully) and post them here of the bag I use most lately. It doesn't allow for carrying components for both loose shot and round ball shooting, but it works pretty well for either if I switch stuff out depending on what I'm hunting. The heart shaped bag, and it's dimensions, shown by Paranger would probably be a good choice if most shooting is done with wads. I've been keeping my wads/wadding in a separate leather bag in my pouch. It has a leather wang connecting it to the pouch strap so I can take it out and let it hang when accessing it. This also gives me access to the ball bag or tin of shot cartridges below it.
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Jan 13, 2023 10:18:19 GMT -7
Good advice already given above.
Kidney, D, heart shape and square you would be well suited. Most investigating I've found has pointed to the construction of the majority being made of one piece and small. I personally find a small bag more desirable.
|
|
|
Post by spence on Jan 13, 2023 11:17:29 GMT -7
Excuse the not-quite-on-topic divergence, but I have a question. Over the years I’ve come to think that early bags were smaller and grew larger over time, while horns started larger and grew smaller. Also, that early-on horns were carried on separate straps and later tended to be attached to the bags. I don't have any period documentation of my impression. Does anyone know of any research into any of these questions that is available?
Spence
|
|
coot
City-dweller
Posts: 152
|
Post by coot on Jan 13, 2023 11:19:42 GMT -7
For what its worth, I have the same impression.
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Jan 13, 2023 12:53:08 GMT -7
From my own observations I find it difficult to really pinpoint a particular bag to any real particular area, region or maker unlike that of horn work. Seems the lot and variety of bag styles and shapes tended to be all over the colonies and frontier. However what I've manged to conclude is the D and square were very common shapes. With horn weathering time better than cloth and leather no suprise we haven't many originals left to study. Spence brings up a good conversation piece. Something I've noticed but haven't any hard evidence to support it for the most part. A mini series was written by a few gentlemen, can't for the life of me remember their darn name(s)... Base study was on Virginia/ NC shooting bags and accoutrements. Excellent examples of this theory with lots of original images. Need to find the pdf which I don't have saved, rather irritated by this. I'll try and find a pdf and post it's link. Found it! ehcnc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Hunting-Bags-1.pdfThree part series, first part on the shooting bags is above.
|
|
|
Post by lenapej on Jan 13, 2023 13:50:37 GMT -7
Thank you all for the info, and discussion. I was reading after a modern bag maker ( don't remember his name) and his opinion was that because PA was a more settled area, at least the eastern part, that there would have been a better chance to have a very well made bag, my goal on this bag is to fashion it like it was made on the frontier, and I think I will take different images and ideas from the period and put them together and see if I can mess it up, Lol will try to get pics up when finished. To Spence's discussion, I have the same impression, and most of the original (supposedly) late 18th century bags I noticed did have the horn attached to the bag straps.
|
|
|
Post by spence on Jan 13, 2023 14:58:15 GMT -7
Excellent, hawkeyes. thank you. That looks like a good read, and a marvelous collection of photos. I saved all three parts.
Spence
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Jan 13, 2023 16:49:17 GMT -7
Spence, I have gotten the same impression. I have to admit I can not pinpoint the articles, pictures and posts that have given me this impression. My collections of screenshots and saved posts and web pages is not as organized as your collection of information.
|
|
|
Post by brokennock on Jan 13, 2023 18:18:09 GMT -7
Here are the pics I promised yesterday of the shot pouch I use most these days, It is currently set up for squirrel hunting. One of the larger tins has preloaded paper shot cups/cartridges, the other is divided and has thin cards, lubed felt wads, a few nitro cards and oil soaked cushion wads (just in case a Skychief load is called for). The small tin in the hanging pocket is always in there somewhere. It contains my thicker consistency lube for sealing my pan/frizzen and making a small dam where stock and barrel meet just forward of the lock in wet weather. The other leather bag can stuff inside or hang from the strap. It contains a bunch of prelubed balls of faux-tow, a few dry felt wads, and a few more thin cards. Those cards are easy to drop so I scatter then in many places. This bag works well for single purpose use, it is too small for both roundball and shot accoutrements. When at the range shooting roundball or when deer hunting, the two larger tins come out and a bag of roundballs goes in. Pictures of the Gussler bag, and/or copies of it, abound on the internet. I intend at some point to make a slightly larger bag for hunting with shot, probably with a gusset and maybe another pocket. Probably will make it wider moreso than deeper which will accommodate hanging my net game bag from it better and make things more accessible with them not being stacked on eachother. I do really like that heart shaped bag shown above, looks a good size. I've just always assumed that with Mr. Murphy hanging on me like he does, in a bag that shape whatever I need will be in that narrow bottom part when I need it.
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Jan 14, 2023 4:39:18 GMT -7
Thank you all for the info, and discussion. I was reading after a modern bag maker ( don't remember his name) and his opinion was that because PA was a more settled area, at least the eastern part, that there would have been a better chance to have a very well made bag, my goal on this bag is to fashion it like it was made on the frontier, and I think I will take different images and ideas from the period and put them together and see if I can mess it up, Lol will try to get pics up when finished. To Spence's discussion, I have the same impression, and most of the original (supposedly) late 18th century bags I noticed did have the horn attached to the bag straps. I personally believe a well constructed one piece bag with a welt would serve you nicely in any of the described shapes. With bags tending to be smaller I've came to the conclusion this is what I like, mostly of a heart or square style without a button. These small bags also need be only large enough to carry exactly what one needs to feed their firelock, nothing else. I'll take a well crafted simple fashioned bag over an elaborated contemporary piece any day. I've personally adopted a simple minimalist mindset. The deeper I go down the 18th century rabbit hole I'm finding our ancestors were that way as well on their respective frontier settings.
|
|