|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 1, 2022 20:28:32 GMT -7
Show me your Belt Axe’s. I’m a a surveyor, I need one with enough bit to take care of a 2” limb on a regular bases but drive a 1”x1” stake. And still carry on my belt. Blade guard ideas are needed as well.
RM
|
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Jan 2, 2022 6:39:15 GMT -7
 You seem to be looking for a rather substantial one. This is my beefiest belt axe. The head is 6" long with a 3" cutting edge. It has a low profile rectangular hammer poll similar to the British light infantry axe. The haft is 19" long, 1.25" diameter oak. This is an original carried by Captain Reuben Briscoe, who commanded a company in the 3rd VA Regt. ca. 1777, so "hc/pc" is a given 😊 |
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Jan 2, 2022 7:43:32 GMT -7
Agreed with paranger, a substantially larger description is what comes to mind. The largest I'd likely consider would be a patterned British infantry axe. It has a short poll and is hefty but indeed gets the job done but could also be carried on the belt with ease. Throws good as well if that tickles your fancy. How your wanting to carry it shouldn't be a problem. Being aloft in the forest on a trek with a heavy hawk or axe is not a fun endeavor and should be avoided, just my two cents. Mine is patterned of an original found in Virginia.   Mild steel head with a 1095 bit sandwiched and forge welded . Length of the head from the bit to the poll is a little over 6" with a flared bit a tad over 3". The poll is just shy of 1.5" and the handle is 14". Something similar to this would serve you well. In terms of chopping power you can slice a 2" limb with a smaller axe, just obviously takes longer! With a beaver chop you can tackle just about anything you want with ease if you have a good sharp edge and profile. |
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 2, 2022 8:34:26 GMT -7
Wow! Dang an original no less!!!
Yessir,
That is the idea, it would be more for work than fighting. The surveyors were paid by the mile so they were very serious about getting things done. Hopefully militia or regulars would be providing security against hostile threats etc.
RM
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 2, 2022 8:35:58 GMT -7
Agreed with paranger, a substantially larger description is what comes to mind. The largest I'd likely consider would be a patterned British infantry axe. It has a short poll and is hefty but indeed gets the job done but could also be carried on the belt with ease. Throws good as well if that tickles your fancy. How your wanting to carry it shouldn't be a problem. Being aloft in the forest on a trek with a heavy hawk or axe is not a fun endeavor and should be avoided, just my two cents. Mine is patterned of an original found in Virginia. Mild steel head with a 1095 bit sandwiched and forge welded . Length of the head from the bit to the poll is a little over 6" with a flared bit a tad over 3". The poll is just shy of 1.5" and the handle is 14". Something similar to this would serve you well. In terms of chopping power you can slice a 2" limb with a smaller axe, just obviously takes longer! With a beaver chop you can tackle just about anything you want with ease if you have a good sharp edge and profile. |
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 2, 2022 8:41:12 GMT -7
That is just about right with the extended poll. I guess when I say "Belt" axe that is a relatively lose descriptor. Do both of you gentleman carry those on your belt or do you carry then over the shoulder?
Thanks for posting the pics gentlemen.
RM
|
|
|
|
Post by paranger on Jan 2, 2022 8:55:54 GMT -7
That is just about right with the extended poll. I guess when I say "Belt" axe that is a relatively lose descriptor. Do both of you gentleman carry those on your belt or do you carry then over the shoulder? Thanks for posting the pics gentlemen. RM Belt carry for me. |
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyes on Jan 2, 2022 10:16:55 GMT -7
Small of my back with a leather and linen wrapped mask of sorts.
|
|
spence
Hunter
Posts: 1,610
Member is Online
|
Post by spence on Jan 2, 2022 12:17:43 GMT -7
The hawk I've found most useful is this one with a small poll. The handle is 18" long, head is 6.125", bit 3.75", weight 1 lb. 12 oz. It carries easily, is heavy enough for most camp chores, and throws reasonably well. I've always carried my hawks in my belt or sash at the small of my back, don't use a sheath or cover the bit.   Spence |
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 2, 2022 13:03:12 GMT -7
The hawk I've found most useful is this one with a small poll. The handle is 18" long, head is 6.125", bit 3.75", weight 1 lb. 12 oz. It carries easily, is heavy enough for most camp chores, and throws reasonably well. I've always carried my hawks in my belt or sash at the small of my back, don't use a sheath or cover the bit. Spence Looks good, it’s got enough poll to drive stakes too. Thanks for sharing Sir. RM |
|
Keith
City-dweller
Bushfire close but safe now. Getting some good rain.
Posts: 990 
|
Post by Keith on Jan 2, 2022 17:43:10 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by Black Hand on Jan 2, 2022 18:50:57 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by Black Hand on Jan 2, 2022 22:27:43 GMT -7
That is just about right with the extended poll. I guess when I say "Belt" axe that is a relatively lose descriptor. Do both of you gentleman carry those on your belt or do you carry then over the shoulder? Thanks for posting the pics gentlemen. RM Over the shoulder case. |
|
|
|
Post by Sicilianhunter on Jan 5, 2022 6:51:22 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Jan 5, 2022 14:37:59 GMT -7
I'll look into it. I think what I am looking to do, is support a "Local/Forum Member" craftsmen and have one built that looks as close as I can to my period. Trying to avoid products made overseas as well. I am still on the fence a lil bit as to the style. All of these are working "and good look'n" tools of "Death and Construction"  . RM |
|
.